New current theory

From here, I would like to introduce an overview of the new theory of electromagnetism discovered by Tamotsu Usami.

The text from here onwards is quoted from Tamotsu Usami’s website.

Regarding electric current, I was taught in elementary school and junior high school that “electricity flows from the plus to the minus of the power supply, and conversely, electrons flow from the minus to the plus”.

It was also taught that “there are positive and negative charges that carry electricity, and negative charges are electrons.” It seemed that I understood the content of the explanation, and I felt like I didn’t understand it.

Then, Tatsuyuki Kawakubo (former Chairman of the Japan Society of Applied Physics: 1992-94) wrote the following description in “Physics does not understand this, published by PHP Institute, Inc., February 1, 2011”. I have the same feeling when I see it.

And he found the number of copper atoms in 1 ㎤ of copper metal, and the density of free electrons was n＝8.4×10²²／cm³,

Since the electron charge is e＝1.6×10^-19

Coulomb and the cross-sectional area of ​​the overhead wire is 1 ㎠, the average velocity of the electrons can be calculated.

The calculation result of 1.8 mm / sec is posted, but it’s kind of weird

Furthermore, this explanation does not show the so-called flow of exchange.

If alternating current is also an “electron flow”, this electron must constantly change the number of electrons to flow.

How can it be positive or negative?? Mr. Kawakubo further wrote as follows

Mr. Tatsuyuki Kawakubo described that “the average velocity of electrons flowing through the overhead line is 1.8 mm / sec”, and then wrote as follows.

That’s weird.

In the case of alternating current, which Kawakubo interprets as “electrons only move back and forth in power transmission lines,” when the switch is turned on from a power plant or substation where power transmission is stopped. What will happen?

Mr. Kawakubo’s explanation is too irrational.

Is there a distinction between direct current and alternating current in electricity (current)?

Isn’t direct current and alternating current the same electricity?

I will confirm these questions in the preamble of the book.

Considering Mr. Kawakubo’s description that “it is the speed at which electromagnetic waves propagate, that is, the speed of light,” it is impossible for “electrons” to move in a conductor at the speed of light.

According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, if a substance (electron) moves at the speed of light, the mass of that substance (electron) becomes infinite.

Isn’t the “electromagnetic wave” described by Mr. Kawakubo the essence of electricity?

If the receiving antenna receives the “electromagnetic wave” (radio wave) sent from the distant transmitting antenna, a current is generated in that antenna, so isn’t the “electromagnetic wave” the main role of electricity?

While confirming this matter in this chapter, I will approach the essence of electric current (that is, electricity).

(For antennas, refer to the original book “Chapter 11 New Antenna Theory“)

It goes without saying that the question of Mr. Kawakubo, who was quoted in this preface, will be resolved in this book.

Please pick it up and check it.